Labour market and sector leader Jyrki Virtanen from the Industrial Union.

Agree­ment nego­tia­tions mostly complete

3.5.2022

TEXT ANTTI HYVÄRINEN
PHOTOS KITI HAILA

“During the collec­tive agree­ment nego­tia­tions it became clear that the objec­ti­ves of emplo­yers in diffe­rent fields are strictly coor­di­na­ted, even though formally there are no more cent­ra­li­sed collec­tive agree­ments,” explain the sector leaders of the Industrial Union.

All natio­nal collec­tive agree­ments of the Industrial Union have now been drawn up, and company-speci­fic nego­tia­tions in the mecha­nical forest industry have reac­hed a stage where well over 90% of the members are cove­red by the agreements.

The labour market nego­tia­tions stood out with the emplo­yer-side Finnish Forest Industries and the Tech­no­logy Industries of Finland’s denounce­ment of collec­tive bargai­ning activities.

The mecha­nical forest industry moved to company-speci­fic nego­tia­tions, but a new univer­sally binding collec­tive agree­ment was crea­ted in the tech­no­logy industry as a sufficient portion of compa­nies in the sector joined the new Tech­no­logy Industry Emplo­yers of Finland association.

Labour market and sector leader Jyrki Virta­nen from the Industrial Union says that the nego­tia­tions were marked by tigh­te­ned coor­di­na­tion on the emplo­yers’ side. In the past, there has been a sector-by-sector discus­sion on wage funds, but now the compe­ti­ti­ve­ness of the whole of Finland was cons­tantly on the table.

”It felt like an agree­ment was made by the tech­no­logy industry for the whole of Finland,” Virta­nen says.

The emplo­yer side has officially stop­ped making cent­ra­li­sed solu­tions, but in prac­tice this is not the case. There is also a close coor­di­na­tion in textual issues.

”It seems quite crazy that the emplo­yer side has set strict limits, but does not want to formally nego­tiate in a tripar­tite framework,” Virta­nen says.

WAGES WILL BE NEGOTIATED IN THE AUTUMN

The gene­ral policy was a 2% wage increase. Most cont­racts last for 1+1 years, which means that in many fields the wage increa­ses for 2023 will be nego­tia­ted in the coming autumn.

”The aim is to have a wage sett­le­ment in the autumn without having to open up the entire agree­ment,” Virta­nen says.

It felt like an agree­ment was made by the tech­no­logy industry for the whole of Finland.

In regard to the tech­no­logy industry, Virta­nen is concer­ned about the role of the new emplo­yers’ associa­tion in the rounds of nego­tia­tions. It is difficult to conti­nue ongoing nego­tia­tion and deve­lop­ment work if the coun­ter­party has not alloca­ted the resources requi­red for the job.

Collec­tive agree­ments of the Industrial Union are nego­tia­ted in three sectors. Twelve collec­tive agree­ments were nego­tia­ted in the sector led by Virta­nen. In addi­tion to the tech­no­logy industry, agree­ments were drawn up in the forest, agricul­ture and horticul­tu­ral sectors.

TRUST LASTS EVEN IN TIMES OF CRISIS

The labour market round was also about main­tai­ning the entire nego­tia­ting system.

”The aim was to ensure the system of natio­nal collec­tive agree­ments. This influenced the spirit of the nego­tia­tions,” says Toni Laiho, sector direc­tor of the Industrial Union.

In the current situa­tion, it is not self-evident that the emplo­yer side wants to make field-speci­fic agreements.

”We had a reason and motive to show that the tradi­tio­nal system produces results,” Laiho says.

Toni Laiho, sector direc­tor of the Industrial Union.

Nego­tia­tions with the Finnish chemical industry associa­tion were chal­len­ging in terms of both money and texts. Ulti­ma­tely, the agree­ments were crea­ted with wage increa­ses and cont­ract periods in align­ment with the tech­no­logy industry.

”Local agree­ment was added to seve­ral collec­tive agree­ments in a cont­rol­led and inten­tio­nal manner,” Laiho says in rela­tion to prepa­ring for econo­mic uncertainties.

Nine­teen collec­tive agree­ments were drawn up in the sector led by Laiho. In addi­tion to the chemical industry, the sector nego­tia­tes in the car, distri­bu­tion, prin­ting and texti­les industries.

The nego­tia­ting cultu­res are diffe­rent in diffe­rent fields, which is particu­larly evident in the excep­tio­nal situa­tion caused by the coro­na­vi­rus pandemic.

”In fields where there are already confi­den­tial rela­tions­hips, the crea­tion of an agree­ment works even in a more critical situa­tion,” Laiho says.

We had a reason and motive to show that the tradi­tio­nal system produces results.

Next, the joint group work of the unions will conti­nue. At the end of March, the Industrial Union and the chemical industry arran­ged the first joint local agree­ment trai­ning at the Murikka institute.

”In Finland, we can manage by working toget­her if we can manage at all,” Laiho says.

ONE THOUSAND NEW MEMBERS

In the mecha­nical forest industry, the condi­tions for the nego­tia­tions chan­ged already in the autumn of 2020, when the Finnish Forest Industries announced that it would cease collec­tive bargaining.

”In prac­tice, this means that the nego­tia­tions have been long and labo­rious,” says Jyrki Alapar­ta­nen, sector direc­tor of the Industrial Union.

There are nearly 200 compa­nies in the mecha­nical forest industry, so the nego­tia­tion project has been vast. At the begin­ning of April, well over 90 percent of the members of the Industrial Union working in the sector were cove­red by company-speci­fic agreements.

Jyrki Alapar­ta­nen, sector direc­tor of the Industrial Union.

Thanks to the new situa­tion and orga­niza­tio­nal action, the mecha­nical forest industry has brought around 1,000 new members to the Industrial Union.

”The degree of orga­niza­tion has impro­ved clearly, but there is still poten­tial for more,” Alapar­ta­nen says.

Company-speci­fic agree­ments have followed the gene­ral approach establis­hed during the nego­tia­tions. The cont­ract periods are mainly two or three years long.

NEW UNIVERSAL COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT

In the sector led by Alapar­ta­nen, natio­nal collec­tive agree­ments have been nego­tia­ted for the carpentry industry and log house industry. Company-speci­fic agree­ments will be used not only in the mecha­nical forest industry but also in the bio-industry.

The collec­tive agree­ment of the carpentry industry is valid for 1+1 years, meaning that wage increa­ses for the second year of the cont­ract will be nego­tia­ted at the begin­ning of 2023.

The collec­tive agree­ment of the log house industry is comple­tely new. Compa­nies that were previously under the collec­tive agree­ment for the mecha­nical forest industry orga­nized into the Associa­tion of Finnish Woodwor­king and Furni­ture Industries, which nego­tia­ted a natio­nal collec­tive agreement.

The degree of orga­niza­tion has impro­ved clearly, but there is still poten­tial for more.

The log house industry employs approxi­ma­tely 700 produc­tion workers and 200 emplo­yees. The new collec­tive agree­ment covers approxi­ma­tely 90 percent of the turno­ver and emplo­yees of the sector, meaning the agree­ment is univer­sally binding.

Alapar­ta­nen belie­ves that more collec­tive agree­ments could come through the log house industry’s model.

”I believe that there are industries within the mecha­nical forest industry where wisdom could arise to return to natio­nal agreements.”

 

The content of univer­sally binding collec­tive agree­ments is announced on the union’s website, and the content of company-speci­fic agree­ments can be inqui­red from the chief workers’ repre­sen­ta­tive at the workplace.