Fighting wage dumping with collec­tive agreements

In Finland, the minimum terms of emplo­y­ment – like pay, holidays and working hours – are usually agreed between trade unions and emplo­yers’ associa­tions. There is no minimum pay provi­sion in the legis­la­tion. This is defined for every branch in their collec­tive agreement.

18.8.2021

In January this year, there were 164 generally binding valid collec­tive agree­ments. This makes up more than half of all collec­tive agreements.

What is this generally binding collec­tive agree­ment and how does it work? It simply means that all emplo­yers in a certain branch must follow such collec­tive agree­ment as a minimum level for the terms of employment.

Though the actual deal is done between a trade union and an emplo­yers’ associa­tion of that very branch, being generally binding extends the validity of the agree­ment even to those compa­nies which are not members of the employer association.

This guaran­tees the same minimum condi­tions and pay to all. It is a benefit for both emplo­yees and emplo­yers. Wage dumping harms both: Workers would get low pay and emplo­yers would face unfair compe­ti­tion from compa­nies which dump wages.

Many count­ries do have some kind of practise of generally binding collec­tive agree­ments. But the form varies a lot. In Finland, the practise is quite comprehensive.

When the collec­tive agree­ment is not generally binding, but so called normally binding, it is adhered to only by those compa­nies that are members of the emplo­yers’ associa­tion or those who sign it separately.

The latest research on the coverage of collec­tive agree­ments gives the figures from 2017. Then, 1.2 million emplo­yees in the private sector were covered by collec­tive agree­ments. Without the system of generally binding agree­ments, 270,000 of these emplo­yees would have been left out of the minimum terms and collec­tive agreement.

Having a collec­tive agree­ment makes a real diffe­rence. Under the law there is no provi­sion for many of the benefits workers take for granted. Without collec­tive agree­ments there would be no agreed pay increases, no holiday bonus, no shift bonuses, no per diem on work trips or no free holidays during the year, like Christmas, Easter and Midsummer.

Not every collec­tive agree­ment is generally binding. Usually, this status demands that more than half of the emplo­yees in that branch are working in compa­nies that are members of the emplo­yers’ association.

The Ministry of Social Affairs and Health appoints the Advisory Board for Ratifica­tion of the Validity of Collec­tive Agree­ments. It is composed of experienced judges and researc­hers and decides whether an agree­ment gets the generally binding status.

TEXT HEIKKI JOKINEN
ILLUSTRATION EMILIE UGGLA